|
Zipper's Driving School - News Views & Trivia
NEWS & VIEWS archives page 2 |
|
|
| ||
| IS DTAL WORKING? | WHAT IS HAPPENING TO DTAL? | NOT ALL QUESTIONS ANSWERED |
|
(This article was written before the sudden changes to the DTAL Program was announced. Whether the "new system" will overcome these problems or not, will have to be seen). There is a current wave of concern that the DTAL program's subsidised logbook CBT&A-based training system is not producing safe novice drivers. Many of the concerns come directly from a group of professional NT driver trainers who are worried about the way many students are trained, the adverse impact on overall road safety, and the bad publicity which driving instructors are getting at present. ALLEGATIONS OF MISTREATMENT Allegations include: |
This was written in November 2003 after the logbook assessing system was unceremoniously cancelled without warning - causing outrage from instructors and their students. Significant changes to the governance and operation of the DTAL program was not warmly received at first. Confusion reigned in the NT driver training industry in March this year as major changes were made to the DTAL Program and to the CBT&A-based log book training system. PROGRAM TEMPORARILY HALTED DTAL Theory classes were halted in December 2003 after a funding shortfall while DTAL was put "on hold" pending review. This caused a lot of confusion and tension among training providers who were uncertain of their future. Students on the program who passed their Final Check Drive on the log book system had to pay for the issue of their Provisional licence, despite having paid their $66 entrance fee with the understanding that this cost would be covered. CHANGE IN FUNDING & GOVERNANCE DTAL is now funded by DEET (Dept of Employment, Education & Training) instead of through the MACA (Motor Vehicle Compensations Act) scheme administered by the Territory Insurance Office, and now follows financial-year management practices. Governance of the DTAL Program is transferred from the DTAL Board of Governance to the Employment and Training division of DEET. LETTER TO INSTRUCTORS On 27th Feb Mr Roger Bryett, Director Training Branch sent a letter to Authorised Driving Instructors (ADIs) outlining the program Guidelines: |
In May 2004 a meeting of all stakeholders in the DTAL program was held to explain the sweeping changes to the DTAL Program. Not all the fears of instructors were allayed however... Although the 10th May meeting addressed and answered some questions, there are many concerns to be raised. Some examples of these are: Query handling at MVR At present, trainers do not know the best person to talk to at the MVR to get accurate information. Closely related is the next concern... Consistency in advice There have been significant differences in advice received, not only between the two departments DEET & DIPE, but also from within the MVR Audit Cell in DIPE. Long waiting list for Vehicle On Road Tests (VORT) (6 weeks, will possibly worsen) DIPE maintains that a long waiting list is an advantage which helps ensure that applicants have retained their skills. This is certainly true, but it is the right solution for the wrong problem. It is up to the applicant, assisted by the trainer, to ensure that his/her skills are maintained and it is up to the MVR as a Public Service to ensure that VORT tests are available within a reasonable time. Long waiting lists encourage desperate instructors & students to "bulk book" well ahead, adding to the difficulty of conducting cost-efficient training and further straining the limited resources of the MVR. Differences between Log Book and VORT This is a serious concern, there is no doubt that the Competency Based assessing system is far superior if done correctly. Closely related is the next concern... Depth of knowledge & experience of current Licence Testing Officers (LTO) This is a major concern of all driver trainers, especially the experienced ones used to the higher standards & greater professionalism of the "pre-log book" LTOs. Also of concern is that complaints against LTOs by instructors on behalf of their students (inconsistency, unfair testing, mis-treatment) do not seem to have reached the higher levels of authority within Road User Division. The above are just a few examples of the concerns which will be raised during the DTAL review process. |
| | Go to Top of Page | Last updated 17th June 2008 Copyright © 2007-2008 John Ziersch | ||